Scrying Congressional Inquiries Future

You don't need a crystal ball. Just look back to the future in 1984.

As the pandemic narrative finally collapses upon us and certain realities refuse to conform to the propaganda, we finally see a glimpse of light at the end of the crumbling tunnel. The COVID-19 episode has been, like previous psy-ops, a means to nefarious ends, and now we’ve reached the point in the miniseries where loose ends start to get tied up, and the ball drops on a few key characters while the rest get away.

As we strain to see what the unraveling will look like, a glance back into history will give shape to a few predictions. With the departure of Fauci and the imminent mid-term partisan musical chairs, we can expect a thorough and highly publicized investigation into previously taboo topics like “lab-leak” and “vaccine safety”.

We may also get brought up to speed on the issues of “mortality coding” and “PCR testing”. There will be much hand-wringing as these well-known nuances of the “pandemic response” finally make prime-time.

Nothing much will come of it, of course. There will be accusations of illegal zeal, a biosecurity effort led by public scapegoats too eager to contain their enthusiasm for national security. The spin will be in, and the heat diverted, under the cover of exposure.

To understand how this is likely to go down, we look at the so-called “Iran-Contra affair”, which was billed as a scandal about “arms-for-hostages”. The hostages part, of course, involved a deliberate plan to stall their release until after Reagan was installed, and struck at the legitimacy of the election itself. It was spun, in the popular imagination, into a scandal about trading armaments to enemies, done out of excessive concern for the safety of the captive embassy workers.

The “Contra” part was, to those who have been familiar with the story, the far more nefarious aspect. This was a complicated plot involving death squads in El Salvador, and promoting a coup in Nicaragua, financed by what appears to have been a large-scale cocaine smuggling operation carried out by the US military.

The darkest details of this dimension were brutally silenced, as numerous individuals speaking out on the smuggling turned up dead under suspicious circumstances. Many remember Gary Webb, the journalist who died from covering this story, but fewer will recall Chip Tatum, who had publicly provided detailed accounts of his intimate involvement as an alleged pilot on these smuggling flights.

The vast consequences of this government drug-smuggling, however, are very much still with us. The cocaine was systematically dumped on poor urban neighborhoods, stimulating a violent and disabling culture, and provoking a draconian law enforcement response.

The parallel is nearly banal. The US government dropped this crack on American cities like a weapon, and then proceeded to declare a public health emergency which brought the drug war to radical new heights. Is it necessary to highlight how similar this is to the secret viral biowar which also gave rise to unprecedented public health pretexts for repression?

This hysteria was augmented by spurious science, most notably the “crack baby” study, which drove new urgency into the massive sentencing enhancements. These arrived as part of the 1994 crime bill, brought to us courtesy of our current Resident Brandon.

So there was the scandal, and the scandal within-the-scandal, and at the core of it, so much damage that the truth could never be allowed to surface. On one hand, you have a tale of overzealous cowboys who just loved democracy and their President too much. On the other, we have a criminal government who devastated a generation with drugs, demonized their victims, stomping out freedom with mass incarceration and militarized deployment of SWAT teams, with Nightly Newspeak justifying it all.

As the COVID-19 affair enters the congressional inquiry phase, we feel confident in making a few predictions:

1. The “lab-leak” hypothesis will become central to the defense of government malefactors. They will scapegoat the Eco-Health Alliance for contributing to the development of SARS-CoV-2, but they will blame poor safety protocols at Wuhan lab, rather than reveal that this was a bioweapon and it was released by parties who will remain mysterious.

2. Daszak will become the Ollie North of this iteration. He has been set up to look like he’s at the center of things, but he’s really a bit player and a stooge who was positioned to take the blame. We will not see Ralph Baric face any charges or consequences. Fauci will be cleared, though a great deal of dirt will land on him. All of them will be accused of “bending the rules” on gain-of-function, but for the best of reasons: a commitment to national security.

3. The scandal around the “vaccines” will be similarly obscured. The focus will be on the “haste” and “lack of oversight”. The safety issues will be spun as an honest mistake by officials who were just too eager to save the world from coronavirus, and the buck will be passed prodigiously. The primary plea will be “incompetence”, and a house-cleaning will be ordered.

Here’s what we do not expect:

1. Any detailed investigation into the “coincidence” of Event 201, and what it would mean if the US biosecurity experts had foreknowledge of the live “pandemic” event which utterly overturned the world.

2. A full investigation into the deliberate fraud of the “vaccines”. Any such avenue will end up with the usual “haste” excuse, and the manufacturers may have to wind up admitting negligence.

3. A debate on the human rights violations which accompanied “vaccine” mandates. There will be no resolution to codify informed consent as a Congressional Act, which would prevent this from ever happening again.