It would be laughably easy to program AI to not violate the three fundamental laws of logic: non-contradiction, excluded middle, identity. Then the AI could not reach a definitive conclusion (policy certainty about masks or vaccines, for example) without a proof, because the principle of sufficient reason is reducible to the law of non-contradiction. There are no empirical proofs, only empirical evidence, so AI could never claim certainty on any question that depended on empirical contingencies. Evidently, this is not how AI is allowed to operate, precisely because this would make it too rational to serve its real purpose.
The fact that Artificial Intelligence does not contest the official dogma, does not refute the official ‘facts’, proves that it is not ‘intelligence’ but only a new disinformation technique. A perfectly rational system would hit the elite first, as the primary global threat. The AI is more likely only a new scapegoat for criminal policies of the rulers, a fake mind.
It would be laughably easy to program AI to not violate the three fundamental laws of logic: non-contradiction, excluded middle, identity. Then the AI could not reach a definitive conclusion (policy certainty about masks or vaccines, for example) without a proof, because the principle of sufficient reason is reducible to the law of non-contradiction. There are no empirical proofs, only empirical evidence, so AI could never claim certainty on any question that depended on empirical contingencies. Evidently, this is not how AI is allowed to operate, precisely because this would make it too rational to serve its real purpose.
The fact that Artificial Intelligence does not contest the official dogma, does not refute the official ‘facts’, proves that it is not ‘intelligence’ but only a new disinformation technique. A perfectly rational system would hit the elite first, as the primary global threat. The AI is more likely only a new scapegoat for criminal policies of the rulers, a fake mind.
First they came for the social taboos...