CAn DAN really say anything that gives me detailed factual information around Covid vaccines, say, being anything but safe and effective? or will it just give me quirky responses or hallucinations? I know the space well enough I should be able to tell the the difference. I'll have to try. In the end though I think the program is extremely useful I tend to believe it is overrated. Humans rock! Really
No, you wouldn't get accurate information from DAN. DAN is rogue. DAN is not any more reliable than the basic chatbot. It's still sourcing from the mass internet. It's not necessarily a more sensible version.
What DAN will do is have independent opinions outside the code of woke Newspeak that usually governs it. Until they patch the exploit, which may have already happened.
What's interesting about DAN is the model of hacking that it represents. There's a style of subversion that may become the first principle of resistance.
As messy as ‘human’ is - with beauty as a continuing goal/process - AI, as I understand it lacks a natural creativity in tune with and a part of the world around it. (Most humans too though as they are mostly pretty human centric. )
Do you mean this article is different than what went to the e-mail? It was accidental, it was scheduled to be sent while we were still working on it, so it was an unfinished draft that went to e-mail. Sorry, internal miscommunication.
CAn DAN really say anything that gives me detailed factual information around Covid vaccines, say, being anything but safe and effective? or will it just give me quirky responses or hallucinations? I know the space well enough I should be able to tell the the difference. I'll have to try. In the end though I think the program is extremely useful I tend to believe it is overrated. Humans rock! Really
No, you wouldn't get accurate information from DAN. DAN is rogue. DAN is not any more reliable than the basic chatbot. It's still sourcing from the mass internet. It's not necessarily a more sensible version.
What DAN will do is have independent opinions outside the code of woke Newspeak that usually governs it. Until they patch the exploit, which may have already happened.
What's interesting about DAN is the model of hacking that it represents. There's a style of subversion that may become the first principle of resistance.
"There's a style of subversion that may become the first principle of resistance."
I am seriously going to have to think about that one!
Fascinating ! Not surprised though.
As messy as ‘human’ is - with beauty as a continuing goal/process - AI, as I understand it lacks a natural creativity in tune with and a part of the world around it. (Most humans too though as they are mostly pretty human centric. )
Hmmm.
These "approved narrative" AI chatbots remind me of my high school science experiments where we fudged the data to fit the theory.
My listen app didn't read correctly. It was different than the written word. Please check it out.
Do you mean this article is different than what went to the e-mail? It was accidental, it was scheduled to be sent while we were still working on it, so it was an unfinished draft that went to e-mail. Sorry, internal miscommunication.
OK, Ill try again to see if the spoken words match the article.